okay

Thus, resistance, and deconstruction itself, reinstates a larger totality wherein order 'always already' reigned, by the very role it is playing in remaining to play its role as a designated resistance. This is quite evident if we look at deconstruction itself in that rather than opening up new radical possibilities, it tends to subsume all texts under an 'archi-writing,' that, though it defies the dominant logocentric metaphysics of presence, it essentially is analogous to the concept of the law. Or, in other words, rather than creating a situation wherein meaning is impossible or where meaning is completely manipulatable, as it is usually thought, deconstruction inscribes them all (using 'problematization marks') under the law of the plural— a complete totality of meaning that does not allow for any critique except those forms of resistance that have been designated by the conceptual order it creates.